An Ethical Dilemma Is Discussed In The Ice Tub
After practice, certain guys swear by the ice tubs. These are exactly what they sound like: big Rubbermaid tubs filled with cold water and ice that sit outside the facility. Guys soak in them to help with injury prevention and recovery, usually still in their uniform pants and t-shirts along with neoprene covers on their toes.(While some guys swear by the ice tubs, other guys emphatically don't. One guy who doesn't is Clinton Portis -- "It's too cold," Portis says. "It hurts." -- and another is Fred Smoot. "I don't take it," Smoot says. "Have you seen me in there? I'm from Mississippi, right? You know, I'm a southern guy, I don't deal well with ice. That's why they ran me from Minnesota. I'm a warm climate guy." Although even Smoot has been known to get in on very rare occasions.)
Whether by coincidence or climate-related inevitability, the guys who have played in Canada are ice tub regulars: Shaun Suisham, Chris Wilson, and Domonique Dorsey. Suisham is in there enough that even the Associated Press has written about it (in the same story that correctly notes that he sounds just like actor Owen Wilson).
Ice tub conversations can run the gamut from sincere to mocking, as you'd expect, but every so often you hear one that is genuinely surprising, amusing, and even thought-provoking. This particular episode of the Suisham And Wilson Happy Ice Tub Funtime Show started on Saturday when the duo was sitting in one tub, with people giving Suisham a hard time for his lack of work in the Ravens game.
"Hey," he said, "last time we played the Ravens in preseason, I got my first unnecessary roughness fine." No one seemed to believe him.
"Really," he said. "It was a kickoff in the second half, and there's two guys from the wedge that are still with the returner when I got to him. He was a wedge guy -- I mean, he wasn't big, but he was probably about Chris's size." Suisham laughed, and the 6-foot-4, 247-pound Wilson rolled his eyes. "Anyhow, big guy, running up, and the returner was behind him. So I was obviously trying to get lower to get through, and he kept going lower and I kept going lower, so I got under his shoulder pads to make the tackle."
"You chopped him," said Wilson, a special-teams regular.
"I made the tackle," Suisham said.
Wilson gave him a look. "You chop him?"
"I didn't chop him." Suisham paused. " Well, technically I guess I did."
"Yeah. Illegal," Wilson said. "Thank you."
"But I made the tackle!"
"How much lower can you get before you're ducking?" Wilson asked. "Just say, 'I ducked.'"
"You say I ducked," Suisham retorted, "how could I make a tackle when I ducked?"
"You trip him?" Wilson suggested. "You're a speed bump."
"No," Suisham said. "I got to the guy. He didn't trip up on me, I made the tackle." Suisham returned to the story he had started with. "Anyway, no penalty on the play. Tuesday morning I find the letter sitting on my chair. Made $200 and the game cost me five grand. That was my first-ever fine. Wasn't even sure what the envelope was when I saw it."
I asked Wilson if he ever worries about the threat of unnecessary roughness when he sees the kicker coming up to block him.
"Not unnecessary roughness," he said, "'cause that's the macho way of saying something. 'Unnecessary roughness,' that's the clean way. He cut a guy."
"I made the tackle," Suisham said. "There's a guy in my way!"
Wilson began to recite the rule in the flat tones of someone repeating something they've learned through endless rote repetition. "In the NFL during a change of possession, whether it's an interception or a special teams play, you can't go low. You can't chop below the kness. You can't even do that in high school. It's dangerous! It's very unnecessary," he said, now answering my original question, "but there's no roughness factor. Maybe a fear factor."
"Let me ask you this," Suisham said. "Do you think, just trying to be a football player and make a play, do you think I should take the guy high, get run over, and they go down for a touchdown?"
"That's the RULES," Wilson said. "You know, in soccer, you're allowed to use your head--"
"I'm a hockey player, man," Suisham said. "Don't bring soccer into this."
"Okay. But you're not gonna try to headbutt the ball through the uprights [in football]. You're gonna kick it."
Suisham did not follow the analogy (which was admittedly less clear without the bracketed [in football] attached). "What are you talking about?
Wilson appealed to me. "He's trying to ask, 'Should I take the guy high?' Like, what do you mean? There's no going below the waist."
Well, I suggested, Suisham's posing it as a sort of ethical dilemma, about breaking the rules versus giving up the touchdown.
Wilson turned his attention back to Suisham. "How many guys was it? Two?"
"It's been a couple of years," Suisham said, "and you know how things can get exaggerated. I think there were two, but there was definitely one right in front of the ball carrier. It's kinda like a fish story, y'know?"
Wilson rolled his eyes again. "Well, if there's two guys, what you wanna do, you wanna make yourself skinny and split 'em. Make 'em both block you and take on two guys."
Suisham started to explain -- "But I'm comin' at an angle and they're going this way..." -- before settling for the basic "I couldn't do that."
"You couldn't get skinny and take on two? It's probably one guy," Wilson said calmly.
"But if I took on two, that guy's coming loose," Suisham pointed out, "and I still wanted to get to the ballcarrier."
"Maybe he thought it was two guys," Wilson suggested, "and it was one big guy."
"Hey," Suisham said. "We all made an agreement at the start of the year a couple of years ago: we said we finish at the ball."
Wilson agreed. "That's what we said."
"That's what we said," Suisham repeated. "And I understand the rules, but I'm not sure what else I should've done in that situation."
"Ask [special teams coordinator Danny Smith] about a buttonpress," Wilson suggested, but it was easier just to ask Wilson himself. "A buttonpress is when you tackle the ballcarrier with the blocker. I did it in the game Thursday. Tight end came out to block me, I just threw him into the ballcarrier. I didn't get credit for the tackle, but ballcarrier went down."
Well, fair enough. But could Suisham actually do that?
"With those guns?" Wilson asked. "Look!"
"Chris," Suisham said, "you gotta understand what you got. I'm not worried about messing myself up, but you gotta know what you're working with."
"What d'you weigh?"
Suisham shrugged. "203."
"Two hundred?!? You can make plays at 203," Wilson said, incredulous.
"I did make the play," Suisham insisted, but Wilson remained adamant.
"You cut the guy." He turned to me. "I commend him on making the tackle, but the way he got there was not right."
"You chopped him," said Wilson, a special-teams regular.
"I made the tackle," Suisham said.
Wilson gave him a look. "You chop him?"
"I didn't chop him." Suisham paused. " Well, technically I guess I did."
"Yeah. Illegal," Wilson said. "Thank you."
"But I made the tackle!"
"How much lower can you get before you're ducking?" Wilson asked. "Just say, 'I ducked.'"
"You say I ducked," Suisham retorted, "how could I make a tackle when I ducked?"
"You trip him?" Wilson suggested. "You're a speed bump."
"No," Suisham said. "I got to the guy. He didn't trip up on me, I made the tackle." Suisham returned to the story he had started with. "Anyway, no penalty on the play. Tuesday morning I find the letter sitting on my chair. Made $200 and the game cost me five grand. That was my first-ever fine. Wasn't even sure what the envelope was when I saw it."
I asked Wilson if he ever worries about the threat of unnecessary roughness when he sees the kicker coming up to block him.
"Not unnecessary roughness," he said, "'cause that's the macho way of saying something. 'Unnecessary roughness,' that's the clean way. He cut a guy."
"I made the tackle," Suisham said. "There's a guy in my way!"
Wilson began to recite the rule in the flat tones of someone repeating something they've learned through endless rote repetition. "In the NFL during a change of possession, whether it's an interception or a special teams play, you can't go low. You can't chop below the kness. You can't even do that in high school. It's dangerous! It's very unnecessary," he said, now answering my original question, "but there's no roughness factor. Maybe a fear factor."
"Let me ask you this," Suisham said. "Do you think, just trying to be a football player and make a play, do you think I should take the guy high, get run over, and they go down for a touchdown?"
"That's the RULES," Wilson said. "You know, in soccer, you're allowed to use your head--""I'm a hockey player, man," Suisham said. "Don't bring soccer into this."
"Okay. But you're not gonna try to headbutt the ball through the uprights [in football]. You're gonna kick it."
Suisham did not follow the analogy (which was admittedly less clear without the bracketed [in football] attached). "What are you talking about?
Wilson appealed to me. "He's trying to ask, 'Should I take the guy high?' Like, what do you mean? There's no going below the waist."
Well, I suggested, Suisham's posing it as a sort of ethical dilemma, about breaking the rules versus giving up the touchdown.
Wilson turned his attention back to Suisham. "How many guys was it? Two?"
"It's been a couple of years," Suisham said, "and you know how things can get exaggerated. I think there were two, but there was definitely one right in front of the ball carrier. It's kinda like a fish story, y'know?"
Wilson rolled his eyes again. "Well, if there's two guys, what you wanna do, you wanna make yourself skinny and split 'em. Make 'em both block you and take on two guys."
Suisham started to explain -- "But I'm comin' at an angle and they're going this way..." -- before settling for the basic "I couldn't do that."
"You couldn't get skinny and take on two? It's probably one guy," Wilson said calmly.
"But if I took on two, that guy's coming loose," Suisham pointed out, "and I still wanted to get to the ballcarrier."
"Maybe he thought it was two guys," Wilson suggested, "and it was one big guy."
"Hey," Suisham said. "We all made an agreement at the start of the year a couple of years ago: we said we finish at the ball."
Wilson agreed. "That's what we said."
"That's what we said," Suisham repeated. "And I understand the rules, but I'm not sure what else I should've done in that situation."
"Ask [special teams coordinator Danny Smith] about a buttonpress," Wilson suggested, but it was easier just to ask Wilson himself. "A buttonpress is when you tackle the ballcarrier with the blocker. I did it in the game Thursday. Tight end came out to block me, I just threw him into the ballcarrier. I didn't get credit for the tackle, but ballcarrier went down."
Well, fair enough. But could Suisham actually do that?
"With those guns?" Wilson asked. "Look!"
"Chris," Suisham said, "you gotta understand what you got. I'm not worried about messing myself up, but you gotta know what you're working with."
"What d'you weigh?"
Suisham shrugged. "203."
"Two hundred?!? You can make plays at 203," Wilson said, incredulous.
"I did make the play," Suisham insisted, but Wilson remained adamant.
"You cut the guy." He turned to me. "I commend him on making the tackle, but the way he got there was not right."
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
8-17-2009 @ 4:11PM
fsaunders said...
May I be the first to suggest a weekly, or even daily, edition of The Suisham And Wilson Happy Ice Tub Funtime Show. But, only if it includes more gems from The Suisham and Moore Happy Ice Tub Funtime Show, e.g. "Black Man's Mullet".
Best thing outta camp so far.
Reply
8-17-2009 @ 5:06PM
fsaunders said...
SI following Matt's tweets:
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/extramustard/hotclicks/08/17/colt-brennan-denies-dating-jessica-simpson/index.html
Reply
8-17-2009 @ 5:48PM
je suis un pizza said...
I guess an analog would be if a ball carrier is running free to the endzone and the only way you could bring him down was by the facemask or a horsecollar tackle, would you do it? Would you do it if you could do it safely?
Suisham's right. Diving or grabbing a facemask or horsecollaring aren't deemed so terrible that they result in ejections. They're 15 yard penalties. I'd say those acts are implicitly allowed but punishable.
Somehow I don't think Lawrence Taylor or Dick Butkus would be hesitant over some ethical quibblings. They'd stop the ballcarrier.
Reply
8-17-2009 @ 6:11PM
jflow78 said...
I'd have to say take down the ball carrier and take the penalty, hoping no one gets seriously injured. Save the score man, that's what you gotta do. No one's going to be happy with you if you try to form tackle two or three people and the ball carrier breaks a big one.
I love this team, your coverage is great Matt. It just makes the players more human, it's cool to see they talk about the same stupid kind of junk that me and my friends do.
Reply
8-17-2009 @ 6:12PM
DAVID ANDERSON said...
Matt any way you can find some video on the play and put it on here?
Reply
8-17-2009 @ 6:13PM
DAVID A said...
Matt any way you can find some video on the play and put it on here?
Reply
8-18-2009 @ 9:55AM
gentlestep said...
I laughed till I cried reading this story, these two really need their own show, can you imagine them in ice tubs having this conversation? This sh*t is genius,
"I did make the play," Suisham insisted, but Wilson remained adamant.
"You cut the guy." He turned to me. "I commend him on making the tackle, but the way he got there was not right."
Chris Wilson was not having it, LOL, good for you Chris! Get your s*** right, Suisham, make a legal tackle, damn it, LOL
Reply
8-17-2009 @ 7:12PM
lizkauai said...
Reminds me of the scene in Remember the Titans where the QB upends a large defender protecting himself from a blitz. The coach is screaming "call unnecessary roughness!" and the official replies "on the quarterback?"
Haha- You go, Shaun! PROTECT THIS HOUSE!
HTTR!
Reply
8-17-2009 @ 7:40PM
steven said...
Suisham did the right thing and attempted to make a play! I know chris wilson aint boasting about making a play, WHERE was he during the ravens preseason game?! bring marcus washington back so we can put orakpo at DE because hes HORRIBLE at coverage were gonna get exposed in the flats when we have orakpo and a running back going 1 on 1!!!! UGHHHH leave it to danny and vinny to ruin a sure thing player in orakpo hes a 4-3 defensive end and a 3-4 linebacker! Just in case vinny and danny diddnt know um we run a 4-3 so why the heck are we putting him at outside linebacker? UGH we have the worst management in the nfl! And why the heck did we draft tryon he doesnt even fit our scheme we like tall physical corners tryon is not physical at all hes only like 5 foot 8. We need fans to start bringing fire vinny cerrato shirts like the lions did to matt millen LOL
Reply
8-18-2009 @ 11:55PM
tramell.canady said...
steven is an idiot to suggest that Snyder and Cerrato decided to play Orakpo at LB. Greg Blache and Zorn are to blame for that. Andre Carter will go to the bench in 2010 and the RE job will belong to Orakpo.
Reply